[uf-dev] parsing question

[Brian Suda]

On 1/11/07, Ryan King <ryan at technorati.com> wrote:
> Thanks for all the input guys. I posted this partially because it
> frustrated and disgusted me and wanted you to share in my pain. :D
>
> I'm acutally thinking now that we should just ignore content inside
> <script> elements. I've yet to see a case where there's valuable
> microformat content inside a script tag.

--- hm, what's that quote, "no reason, should be a reason?" but
generally you are correct, this a sort of special element, because the
<noscript> does convey some semantics. In a parser like X2V that
doesn't handle scripts the try/fail case is the <noscript>

-brian


-- 
brian suda
http://suda.co.uk