From glenn.jones at madgex.com Sat Aug 14 08:01:49 2010 From: glenn.jones at madgex.com (Glenn Jones) Date: Sat Aug 14 08:03:08 2010 Subject: [uf-dev] HTML5 Time element support and test cases Message-ID: <36A319113CF910438942741C4727ADFF04AEEFC9@MOBY.Clarence.local> Hi All I have added HTML5 Time element support and test cases to UfXtract. I built the test cases on my own site rather than the wiki, only because I was unsure about HTML5 support on the wiki. They are relatively simple at the moment. http://ufxtract.com/testsuite/hcard/hcard22.htm http://ufxtract.com/testsuite/hcalendar/hcalendar14.htm Please tell me if you think they are wrong in any way. Glenn Jones From andreluis.pt at gmail.com Sun Aug 15 06:35:34 2010 From: andreluis.pt at gmail.com (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Andr=E9_Lu=EDs?=) Date: Sun Aug 15 06:58:53 2010 Subject: [uf-dev] HTML5 Time element support and test cases In-Reply-To: <36A319113CF910438942741C4727ADFF04AEEFC9@MOBY.Clarence.local> References: <36A319113CF910438942741C4727ADFF04AEEFC9@MOBY.Clarence.local> Message-ID: Glenn, thanks for this. :) Btw: > It's a tiny detail, but you're writing June to the user and specifying May (05) in the @datetime... The parser reads it correctly, but I don't think you meant for that disparity, though. Just a heads up... :) It'd be cool to have a way of reporting conforming tools... having a form to say "This passed using: __________ version: _____ Tested by: _______ [submit]" and have it presented in the footer of the page... :) Cheers, -- Andr? Lu?s On 14 August 2010 16:01, Glenn Jones wrote: > Hi All > > I have added HTML5 Time element support and test cases to UfXtract. > > I built the test cases on my own site rather than the wiki, only because > I was unsure about HTML5 support on the wiki. They are relatively simple > at the moment. > > http://ufxtract.com/testsuite/hcard/hcard22.htm > http://ufxtract.com/testsuite/hcalendar/hcalendar14.htm > > Please tell me if you think they are wrong in any way. > > Glenn Jones > > > > _______________________________________________ > microformats-dev mailing list > microformats-dev@microformats.org > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-dev > From tantek at cs.stanford.edu Sun Aug 15 11:35:29 2010 From: tantek at cs.stanford.edu (=?UTF-8?Q?Tantek_=C3=87elik?=) Date: Sun Aug 15 11:36:10 2010 Subject: [uf-dev] HTML5 Time element support and test cases In-Reply-To: References: <36A319113CF910438942741C4727ADFF04AEEFC9@MOBY.Clarence.local> Message-ID: 2010/8/15 Andr? Lu?s : > Glenn, > > thanks for this. :) > > Btw: > >> ? > > It's a tiny detail, but you're writing June to the user and specifying > May (05) in the @datetime... The parser reads it correctly, but I > don't think you meant for that disparity, though. > > Just a heads up... :) Thanks Glenn and Andr? for demonstrating/noting a real world example of the problem of DRY violation. Even with the values right next to each other - it's too easy to get them wrong. This is good timing (so to speak). I recently wrote up a bunch of suggested improvements for the