[microformats-discuss] Evaulating RSS per the
solitude at solitude.dk
Sun Aug 14 21:54:08 PDT 2005
On Mon, 15 Aug 2005 04:08:34 +0200, Stephen Downes <stephen at downes.ca>
> So what's the difference? Specifically: XHTML uses elements (such as
> 'p', 'h1', etc) that are interpreted automatically by your browser,
> while RSS uses elements (such as 'item','title', etc) that your browser
> requires XSLT in order to interpret.
And that's an unnecessary addition of complexity for blogs. I can either
send an HTML document down the line, or I can send some more or less
random XML document which would then be transformed into HTML anyway.
Might as well send down HTML to begin with.
> Today's browsers can all do this; they can easily display XML using XSLT
> (here is an example: http://www.downes.ca/news/OLDaily.xml )
I just got my usual display XML display (inline items, no formatting). My
browser doesn't support XSLT - it understands HTML just fine. (Opera 8)
> but the kicker is, the XSLT declaration needs to be contained in the RSS
> file and the XSLT must be located in the same domain as the RSS (for the
> browser; on the server side, any XSLT may be applied without restraint).
So do your XSLT on the server. I don't see why this sort of thing should
be moved to the client. My browser is sending HTTP headers telling you
what it prefers.
Commentary on media, communication, culture and technology.
More information about the microformats-discuss