[microformats-discuss] funness -> validator
Dr. Ernie Prabhakar
drernie at opendarwin.org
Tue Aug 16 11:59:06 PDT 2005
On Aug 16, 2005, at 11:50 AM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> One thing I'm finding as I go along is that a validator would be
> intensely useful, because you can (and have to) get pretty creative,
> and it's hard to be sure that the results are still parseable.
That's something I wondered about. Is there a rigorous grammar for
what is and is not a valid microformat, such that someone -could-
write a validator? If not, are we deliberately keeping it vague?
Has it not been needed yet? Or have I just missed it?
-- Ernie P.
More information about the microformats-discuss