[microformats-discuss] funness -> validator

[Dr. Ernie Prabhakar]

On Aug 16, 2005, at 11:50 AM, Lucas Gonze wrote:
> One thing I'm finding as I go along is that a validator would be
> intensely useful, because you can (and have to) get pretty creative,
> and it's hard to be sure that the results are still parseable.

That's something I wondered about.  Is there a rigorous grammar for  
what is and is not a valid microformat, such that someone -could-  
write a validator? If not, are we deliberately keeping it vague?    
Has it not been needed yet?   Or have I just missed it?

-- Ernie P.