[microformats-discuss] Microformat for timestamp of updated content

Joe Gregorio joe.gregorio at gmail.com
Tue Aug 16 23:37:20 PDT 2005

On 8/16/05, Robert Bachmann <rbach at rbach.priv.at> wrote:
> Althought '20050102' is allowed by ISO8601 the long form '2005-01-02'
> is better because it's easier to read for humans.
> Same for '20050102T170512Z' versus '2005-01-02T17:05:12Z'.

Datetime formats were discussed at great length for Atom. As such 
you might want to take a look at:



Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list