[microformats-discuss] Microformat for timestamp of updated content

[Joe Gregorio]

On 8/16/05, Robert Bachmann <rbach at rbach.priv.at> wrote:
> Althought '20050102' is allowed by ISO8601 the long form '2005-01-02'
> is better because it's easier to read for humans.
> Same for '20050102T170512Z' versus '2005-01-02T17:05:12Z'.


Datetime formats were discussed at great length for Atom. As such 
you might want to take a look at:

   http://atompub.org/2005/07/11/draft-ietf-atompub-format-10.html#rfc.section.3.3

   -joe

-- 
Joe Gregorio        http://bitworking.org