[microformats-discuss] re: Microformat for timestamp of updated content

Ryan King ryan at technorati.com
Wed Aug 17 14:39:59 PDT 2005

On Aug 17, 2005, at 12:37 PM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
> Not quite.  He literally meant *between* <abbr> and </abbr>, e.g.  
> in your
> words:
> <abbr class="last-modified" title="[ISO8601 datetime]">
>   [unknown date/time format]
> </abbr>
> And the inside, far from being "unknown" is whatever the content
> author/publisher chooses is appropriate for their site, audience,  
> language,
> locality etc. etc.
> We've been leaning towards restricting the set of ISO8601 datetime  
> used by
> hCalendar to that documented in the W3C datetime note.  Joe's implied
> suggestion to use RFC3339 is something we should consider.

Its not clear to me how RFC 3339 differs from ISO 8601. Can anyone  
summarize the differences?


More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list