[microformats-discuss] re: Microformat for timestamp of updated
coretxt at gmail.com
Mon Aug 22 06:02:47 PDT 2005
> If some people would use 'class="last-modified"' to mark up the last
> modifcation of a page, and other people would use
> 'class="last-modified"' to mark up the last modification of an
> item/entry how could parsers recognize if the whole page or a specific
> item is meant?
It depends what problem the parser is trying to solve (hopefully not
some mythic general case, because that would be a nightmare). The
nesting of container elements should go some way into making such a
distinction relatively recognizable.
<abbr class="last-modified" title="[ISO8601datetime]">22 Aug</abbr>
<abbr class="last-modified" title="[ISO8601datetime]">23 Aug</abbr>
Individual article dates can be recognized here because of the parent
article elements, thus the later date would clearly belong to the page
Though I don't know why an author would want to display dates like
this unless there was substantial content on the page in addition to
the list of articles.
More information about the microformats-discuss