[uf-discuss] Goods and Products microformat
Tantek Ç elik
tantek at cs.stanford.edu
Mon Dec 5 12:03:50 PST 2005
On 12/5/05 11:33 AM, "kenny heaton" <kennyheaton at gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks for your reply Ryan. I had looked at hreview and listing and I
> felt hreview was not appropriate for what I was thinking because it
> lack some specifics about product features I felt important and has
> things like reviewer and rating which wouldn't quite fit for a company
> talking about it's own products. I thought listing was not quite right
> either because it was geared more toward something like craigslist,
> but after a second look I think it might work, although it seems to
> have the potential for being very open ended itself.
I think the "listing" efforts are closest to what you are looking for.
By the way, anytime you find yourself wanting to make something "general" or
being able to describe "arbitrary" "features", considering simply using
E.g. you may want consider simply trying to use xFolk on the URLs of the
products, along with tags for the "features" of those products.
That's one way to avoid the whole defining a comprehensive product / product
feature taxonomy problem.
More information about the microformats-discuss