[uf-discuss] hReview Question/Statement
David Janes -- BlogMatrix
davidjanes at blogmatrix.com
Tue Dec 6 07:36:10 PST 2005
What's the rule for associating "rating" with "best"? I'm looking at
this example [1] from the Wiki:
<ul class="categories">
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Food" rel="tag">
Food: <span class="rating">18</span>/<span
class="best">30</span></a>;</li>
<li><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/tags/Ambience" rel="tag">
Ambience: <span class="rating">19</span>/<span
class="best">30</span></a>;</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Service" rel="tag">
Service: <span class="rating">15</span>/<span
class="best">30</span></a>;</li>
<li><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Price" rel="tag">
Price: <abbr class="rating" title="2">$$</abbr>...</a></li>
</ul>
and the implied rule (if it follows) seems rather loosey goosey: if it's
under the same parent element, associate them?. For example, there's
clear way to write:
<p>
On Fred's <span class="best">4</a> ICBM scale, I give this a <span
class="rating">2</a>.
</p>
Would it not be better to explicitly place them within a named parent
container (say "rated")? Then one no longer needs to make sure
everything is grouped in some explicit way:
<p class="rated">
I rate all my Chilis on a <span class="best">4</span> ICBM scale. The
best I ever had was Texas Joe's Twister, which render large parts of the
midwest uninhabitable later that night and earned a <span
class="rating">4</span> from me.
</p>
Regards, etc...
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list