[uf-discuss] hReview Question/Statement
David Janes -- BlogMatrix
davidjanes at blogmatrix.com
Wed Dec 7 09:57:39 PST 2005
Tantek Çelik wrote:
>>From a schema standpoint, yes, agreed completely. As to the names of the
> specific fields, as noted above, we can reuse the property/"value" construct
> from hCard, and avoid having to have both "rated" and "rating".
> Thanks very much for the feedback David. This will be a definite
> improvement in hReview 0.3.
I'm getting into the spirit of what the spec meanings now, so it's all
becoming a little clearer. I've modified my parser a bit to reflect
your's and Ryan's comments, plus a better understanding how
Here's some parsed hReviews, randomly chosen:
More information about the microformats-discuss