[uf-discuss] XOXO Comments

[Dr. Ernie Prabhakar]

Hi Paul,

> Is the class="xoxo" only allowed on the primary parent?  Would this be
> broken?

I don't think it is "forbidden", but as a practical matter  I don't  
think it should (or even -can-) be "required."  Speaking at least for  
myself, I don't want to have to tag every sublist.  This is one of  
those cases where (as usual ;-) its better to make the parser-writer  
do a little extra work to make things easier on the content creator.

-- Ernie P.

On Dec 28, 2005, at 11:57 AM, Paul Bryson wrote:

> For the sake of simplicity in JavaScript, it would be nice to be  
> able to
> give all <ul> in an XOXO the class="xoxo".  So I might have:
>
> <ul class="xoxo">
>  <li><a>Linkblogs</a>
>    <ul class="xoxo">
>      <li>dive into mark b-links</li>
>      <li>Erics Weblog</li>
>    </ul>
>  </li>
>  <li><a>Another link</a></li>
> </ul>
>
> Is the class="xoxo" only allowed on the primary parent?  Would this be
> broken?
>
>
> Atamido
>
> "Paul Bryson" <paul at msn.com> wrotexoxo
>> The XOXO format doesn't seem to allow, or specify, the use of heading
>> elements for multi-level outlines, such as <h2>, <h3>, etc.  Is  
>> there a
>> reason for this?
>>
>> This example uses <p>
>> http://diveintomark.org/public/2004/01/xo-embeddable.xo
>>
>> This one uses <span> and <a>
>> http://homepage.mac.com/ctholland/thelab/outlines/
>>
>>
>> Also, none of these examples seem to use class="xoxo" in them.  Is  
>> this a
>> required feature, or optional?
>>
>>
>> Atamido
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss