[microformats-discuss] Re: [Geowanking] geo microformat BOF session
at Where 2.0
kevinmarks at mac.com
Wed Jul 6 17:49:17 PDT 2005
On Jul 6, 2005, at 1:57 AM, Edward Mac Gillavry wrote:
> Hmmm... Let's get us back on track, shall we? This list is about
> GEOwanking. But maybe being a cartographer I don't get the
> importance/relevancy of the discussion so far. I agree, there is a
> chance for yet another representation of location to emerge with the
> geo microformat. Therefore I'm happy this thread receives some
> attention as I think there are many ways in which we can contribute to
> a geo microformat.
> However, before going into the implementation, e.g.
> XML/RDF/SomethingElse, what have we come up with so far in our
> previous discussions? Should the geo microformat focus on point
> locations only? Because that's what seems to be the main approach: how
> to structure an address and translate that into a point location?
> However, I seem to remember people on this list have realised it's
> useful to represent area features as well. While we're at it:
> polylines? Should we give an indication of accuracy, spatial
A key use case for a geo microformat is for people to be able to refer
to a place from a web page. Currently, people do this predominantly in
* referring to a human-readable address ('San Francisco', '665 3rd
Street, SF, 94107', '3rd and Townsend', 'by the ballpark'
* linking to an existing map service with a proprietary URL (mapquest,
These are useful in human terms, but they don't really map onto a point
location, as they are referring to a human-scale area.
Bare latitude/longitude is insufficient to present a cartographic
representation to a user, as there is no way to know what scale to
display that map at.
What would be useful, in my view, would be to translate the above into
a latitude, longitude, and radius of interest. These can be translated
back into different map display systems.
Translating the human-readable names is a tricky problem, but one that
mapping services already tackle with variable success, so having a way
of presenting the human-readable and lat/long/radius data as
alternatives is valuable.
More information about the microformats-discuss