[microformats-discuss] xFolk 0.4
bud at thecommunityengine.com
Mon Jul 11 09:04:32 PDT 2005
On Jul 11, 2005, at 11:13, Tantek Çelik wrote:
> taggedLink is fairly obvious what it means.
> With the addition of images, what to do?
> 1. change to a new name for both links and images
> 2. keep taggedLink (perhaps rename to taggedlink) pick a new name
> just for
> (1) keeps the spec "simplest". The challenge is perhaps it becomes
> abstract. RDF has the notion of "about" which many folk have
> "grokking", perhaps because it is too abstract.
> Would "tagged" be sufficient?
> (2) you could have taggedimage, but when do you stop? what if I
> use an
> <object> to embed an audio file? should that be taggedaudio?
Per some IRC conversation, I think it makes sense to put some of
these naming suggestions on a brainstorming page. I want to collect
data before name changing.
Eran, let's focus on your substantive issues first in these email
discussions. I suggest we move to chat. Tantek's point about using
just reltag for comments without links sounds like a good effort.
More information about the microformats-discuss