[microformats-discuss] Brainstorming on a "resume" microformat

Danny Ayers danny.ayers at gmail.com
Wed Jul 13 08:42:57 PDT 2005

On 7/13/05, Tantek Çelik <tantek at cs.stanford.edu> wrote:

> Often such "practical" implied schemas are much better "tuned"/"optimized"
> than explicit schemas in (proposed) standards.

Yep, agreed 100%. 

I'd also add that the notion of a "standard" for a particular domain
(like resumes, reviews, whatever) is less significant around RDF than
most schema languages - you can cherry pick what you like from where
you like, ignore what you don't want, add bits yourself as needed.



More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list