[uf-discuss] generic microformat parsing heuristics?
pilgrim at gmail.com
Mon Nov 7 16:59:22 PST 2005
On 11/7/05, David House <dmhouse at gmail.com> wrote:
> One of the main advantages of a generalised microformat parser is that
> it allows us to write less code when the next compound microformat
> comes out. First off we only had hCard and hCal. Now with things like
> hReview and hAtom coming in, don't you think it would be useful to
> have a decent base which we could just extend when the next
> microformat comes out?
Yes, but that's not an answer to the original question. The original
question was whether one could write a *generic* parser that could
parse new microformats *without prior knowledge of their precise
schemas*. Your "decent base" parser wouldn't do that.
The danger lies in seeing opportunities for code re-use (which is
good), then making the mental leap to "generic code that could parse
new formats without prior knowledge." It sounds like a seductively
small leap to make, but it's not really. It's a black hole from which
no community has ever escaped.
More information about the microformats-discuss