[uf-discuss] Could microformats be classed as spam by search
dougal at gunters.org
Fri Nov 18 08:29:34 PST 2005
justin norton wrote:
> How would this effect the implementation of microformats in relation to
> SEO? Is the microformat standard open to abuse from spammers? And do the
> likes of Google, Yahoo and MSN currently recognise microformats as a
> standard for the presentation of data?
> Thanks a lot,
Show me something that *isn't* open to abuse from spammers. It would be
naive to think that a spammer couldn't use microformats as a way to
trick services. As soon as somebody builds a service that leverages
hFoobar microformatted data in the wild, spammers will start filling
splogs with bogus content formatted as hFoobar. It's pretty much inevitable.
As far as CSS-hidden content goes, there's an awful lot of non-spam
examples of that out there already (including, as already mentioned, in
some uses of microformats). Automatically flagging hidden text as
"spammy" would be an over-reaction, IMO. Ignoring it *may* be prudent
for search engines, however.
Dougal Campbell <dougal at gunters.org>
More information about the microformats-discuss