[uf-discuss] microformats are Sugar? WAS: Avatar Microformat ?
luke.arno at gmail.com
Mon Nov 28 15:19:12 PST 2005
On 11/25/05, Ryan King <ryan at technorati.com> wrote:
> On Nov 24, 2005, at 2:19 PM, Chris Messina wrote:
> > Microformats are for general purpose use, like flour and sugar. Using
> > them you can build things as interesting as pizza or as simple as
> > bread. However, a microformat for pizza would probably be
> > inappropriate or not worth standardizing since its fundamental
> > ingredients can be broken down further into more atomic units.
> Chris, you've made an interesting analogy. Please indulge me as I
> expand on it (beware, I'm still recovering from my thanksgiving-day
> food coma)...
> First, microformats = sugar, flour, or other elemental ingredients
> (see http://microformats.org/wiki/elemental-microformat).
> Microformats also included some compounds (which you'd buy from the
> store, but could also make yourself), like cranberry sauce (I dunno,
> my family doesn't make it from scratch, I also don't eat it :D).
> Now people have been making food (sematic xhtm) for a long time, but
> everyone was always making everything from scratch, even grinding
> their flour and refining their own sugar.
> Finally, some people decided to get together and make the basics,
> which others could then reuse in their own recipes. The benefits of
> this arrangement are obvious, I can make mashed potatoes and gravy
> without having to make butter (inc. milking the cow) myself.
> Mmmm, food.
Oh man, you are making me hungry. :-)
And it is healthiest to stick to raw veggies (XHTML
Compounds) when you can. Also it is best to use
organically produced ingredients.
This is my favorite analogy so far.
More information about the microformats-discuss