[microformats-discuss] Evolution vs Intelligent Design
danny.ayers at gmail.com
Thu Oct 6 13:13:30 PDT 2005
On 10/6/05, Luke Arno <luke.arno at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > Individual microformats have problem statements but observe step 2
> > > in the microformats process.
> > >
> > > http://microformats.org/wiki/process
> > You mean "Document Current Behavior"? I just visited the review
> > research cited as an example. I happen to have produced a review
> > vocabulary myself, the listing on that page is:
> > ----
> > REV
> > * RDF Review Vocabulary: http://www.purl.org/stuff/rev
> > o Supposedly deployed in FilmTrust
> > (http://trust.mindswap.org/FilmTrust/). Unable to verify by going to
> > site.
> > ----
> > The title is wrong, the vocabulary *is* used in FilmTrust as 5 seconds
> > with Google would have verified. Which leaves the link. That's this
> > bit of current behaviour documented?
> Sounds like you should update the wiki.
...and send the research back in time?
More information about the microformats-discuss