[microformats-discuss] RFC: Thoughts on Video and Audio
Charles Iliya Krempeaux
supercanadian at gmail.com
Tue Oct 18 13:26:07 PDT 2005
On 10/18/05, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar <drernie at opendarwin.org> wrote:
> > (Which is where I think you are coming from. Although Microformats
> > like hcard and hcalerdar have more "structure" to them... in the same
> > way that <table> has more structure.)
> > Yes,... I think I understand. You are using the "class" attribute to
> > "invent" new tags. (Is that correct?)
> Yes, absolutely. If there's an appropriate XHTML construct which
> plausibly *does* carry the correct semantics, we ought to use that.
> But if not, we should define that specific semantic as a new class
> name, rather than (ab)using an existing tag inappropriately.
OK, I think I "get it" now. Microformats aren't really anything new.
They're just a formalization of what alot of people have been doing
for quite some time.
Thanks for the explanation.
Charles Iliya Krempeaux, B.Sc.
charles @ reptile.ca
supercanadian @ gmail.com
developer weblog: http://ChangeLog.ca/
Never forget where you came from
More information about the microformats-discuss