[uf-discuss] More on hAtom nomenclature

[Dr. Ernie Prabhakar]

Hi David,

On Oct 26, 2005, at 4:41 AM, David Janes -- BlogMatrix wrote:
> I understand that people have various ideas where this should go  
> and applicability to other data types, etc.. However, can I be  
> given a little room to actually get a proposal together rather than  
> just editing  what I wrote to make it something else. I.e. renaming  
> "atomentry" -> "entry".

My apologies -- I mistakenly interpreted a comment that you had made  
to the effect that you had trouble editing the wiki so you wanted  
*me* to make that change.   I apologize for unintentionally trampling  
your work -- that was not my intent.

> If you think what I've done is wrong, misguided or needs further  
> work, bring the topic up on [[hatom-issues]] and we'll work as a  
> group to a consenus of what should be changed.

Absolutely -- that is 100% how I agree things should be done, and I  
regret inadvertently acting otherwise.

I would change it back, but I'm afraid of screwing things up worse,  
so I'd appreciate it if someone more clueful could revert my edits.   
Thanks.

-- Ernie P.


>
> Regards, etc...
> David
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss

------------
Ernest N. Prabhakar, Ph.D. <drernie at opendarwin.org>
Ex-Physicist, Marketing Weenie, and Dilettante Hacker
Probe-Hacker blog: http://www.opendarwin.org/~drernie/