[microformats-discuss] Re: XFN in Atom

[Ryan King]

BTW, if no one's said it yet, welcome to the list.

-ryan

On Sep 17, 2005, at 1:50 PM, Luke Arno wrote:

> Never mind. It looks like Tantek answered both my questions in another
> thread.
>
> If I understood correctly it is yes to XFN in atom:link and no to  
> IANA and
> prefixes
> because "namespaces create silos," which I can see.
>
> - Luke
>
> On 9/17/05, Luke Arno <luke.arno at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>
>> I am trying to get my head around microformats still.
>>
>> I asked this already but I think it got lost in the previous thread.
>>
>> Does it make sense to do this:
>>
>> <atom:link
>> atom:rel="contact"
>> atom:href="http://examle.org/hCard.html"
>> atom:type="text/xhtml"/>
>>
>> As a side note, has there been considerations of using the IANA  
>> registry
>> for
>> rel values. Could prefixing help avoid conflicts going forward (rel="
>> xfn.contact"?)
>>
>> Like I said, I am just trying to get my head around this.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> - Luke
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>

--
Ryan King
ryan at technorati.com