"uid" microformats? (was Re: [uf-discuss] ISBN mark-up)
Tantek Ç elik
tantek at cs.stanford.edu
Wed Apr 26 09:15:30 PDT 2006
On 4/25/06 8:04 PM, "Edward Summers" <ehs at pobox.com> wrote:
> On Apr 25, 2006, at 6:47 PM, Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
>> FWIW, I like Xiaoming's suggestion.
> I'm glad Xiaoming expressed the case for URI so well.
> I just added it
> to the uid-brainstorming  page. I have to admit I've seen the need
> for a identifying URIs elsewhere and when Tantek pinged microformats-
> discuss with a straw proposal  that would help the LiveClipboard
> and upcoming.org folks I saw an opening to sneak in functionality for
> marking up URIs more generally.
But I think there are two questions here.
1. Marking up URIs more generally.
2. Marking up *the* URI for an item (this is what I believe is meant by
The UID microformat discussion is attempting to solve the latter, though it
is reasonable to at least document our thoughts on the former.
> The naming 'uri' vs 'uid' aside, would it be reasonable to RECOMMEND
> that a URI is used (thus including URLs) and leaving the door open to
> less useful ids should people want to use them?
Yes, and I have just added similar details to uid-brainstorming, preferring
URLs first, then URNs.
> This would allow the
> current hCard behavior to be preserved:
> "UID in vCard simply becomes another semantic applied to a specific
> URL (or EMAIL) for an hCard."
> As Xiaoming suggests both 'http' and 'mailto' are valid URI schemes
> in RFC4395. Allowing a UID this flexibility would mean a UID could
> serve as a module that hCard and hCalendar (and perhaps an hCite and
> others) reference.
>  http://microformats.org/wiki/uid-brainstorming#Proposals
>  http://microformats.org/discuss/mail/microformats-discuss/2006-
Thanks especially for writing this up on the wiki Ed, and helping clarify
these matters. This discussion has been *very* useful. Thanks to everyone
who has braved this passionate thread to help move things forward.
More information about the microformats-discuss