[uf-discuss] Live Clipboard Screen Cast
Stephen Farrell
sfarrell at almaden.ibm.com
Thu Aug 3 11:19:12 PDT 2006
So I agree with what you said. But it makes me wonder why use
microformats for *this application*? What do they buy you over json,
xml, vcard, ical, etc?
Scott Reynen wrote:
> On Aug 3, 2006, at 12:38 PM, Stephen Farrell wrote:
>
>> The issue I found was that if you were pasting an object from one
>> website to another, the blended presentation and content of
>> microformats probably wasn't what you wanted, because you probably
>> wanted the object formatted and styled and presented in the way that
>> the target site wanted. I suggested using microtemplates as a way to
>> handle the presentation on the target site - some client-side
>> templating would be required, for sure. Also, I had to go from
>> microformat to json in order to bind the microtemplate (which got me
>> very unhappy about parsing microformats), which made me wonder whether
>> microformat as a data representation actually worked in this context.
>
> Any use of microformats needs to strip out the irrelevant HTML semantics
> and present the data in a consistent interface. I think the only
> differences between this context and any other are: 1) we are restricted
> to JavaScript, which is more limited than the wide array of server-side
> parsing tools, and 2) the source and target interface are both HTML, so
> it's tempting to think we don't actually have to parse the data. But
> data parsing is required between copy and paste in desktop applications,
> so why should copy and paste on the web be any different?
>
> Peace,
> Scott
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list