[uf-discuss] Comments from IBM/Lotus rep about Microformats
mikeschinkel at gmail.com
Mon Dec 11 20:17:50 PST 2006
Brian Suda wrote:
> Microformats are meant as building blocks and they should be
> able to be using independantly and together...
If that is true, how can it be achieved without a disambiguation conventions
to keep official Microformats from conflicting with similar "techniques."
Or is it the view of the Microformat community that Microformats will keep
it's house clean and, because Microformats are the "anointed" ones that it
just "sucks to be the other guy?"
P.S. Actually it will just suck to be the guy who need to use both an
"official" Microformat and another one that is just a "technique?"
More information about the microformats-discuss