[uf-discuss] Comments from IBM/Lotus rep about Microformats
mikeschinkel at gmail.com
Mon Dec 11 20:12:38 PST 2006
Bruce D'Arcus wrote:
> In a world in which one CAN consider adding alternative
> attributes (HTML 5, etc.), it makes no sense to me one would
> simply say "no."
[I'm cross posting to uf-discuss and whatwg because Bruce's comment was made
on uf-discuss but I've made the same point on WHATWG.]
Bruce, I agree with you completely. But Ian Hickson has said that AFAHK that
there was no cry for additional attributes on the uf-discuss list, And Ian
also said he saw no need for them after I requested to get several
attributes added to the list of attributes applicable to all elements, i.e.
abbr, href, name, rel, rev, scope, size, src, type, and value.
I hadn't had the chance to ask the uf-discuss list about this, so now is a
perfect time. What about adding additional standard attributes to all
elements. Would it be helpful?
More information about the microformats-discuss