[uf-discuss] Comments from IBM/Lotus rep about Microformats
scott at randomchaos.com
Tue Dec 12 14:09:08 PST 2006
On Dec 12, 2006, at 1:38 PM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
> brian suda wrote
>> It is possible for me to start creating a CSS style called
>> 'vcard', but a parser would know that this is a style and not
>> semantics because of the lack of a profile URI. Eventually,
>> as microformats become more popular, the profile URI is used
>> to disambiguate random styles with intended semantic values.
> As I understand it profile URIs are not required.
> If so, the parser cannot distinguish between wild semantic HTML and an
Profile URIs are not required for publishers, but parsers are free to
ignore HTML without profile URIs, and I think it's reasonable to
expect them to start doing that if name conflict becomes more than a
hypothetical problem. This mirrors how natural language works.
Until there is some need for clarification, we assume everyone knows
what we mean. Then there is a need for clarification, we clarify.
No one goes around defining every word before they use it, and I
don't think we can expect publishers to behave differently with HTML
symbols. We could require profile URIs, but that won't make anyone
use them. OI think only a practical need for disambiguation will do
More information about the microformats-discuss