URI profiles [was RE: [uf-discuss] Comments
from IBM/Lotusrepabout Microformats]
Andy Mabbett
andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Sat Dec 16 02:29:25 PST 2006
In message <007f01c720f7$7aa78b80$2102fea9 at Guides.local>, Mike Schinkel
<mikeschinkel at gmail.com> writes
>> Without meaning to sound flippant, they should convince their
>> tool providers to support microformats. It would take some
>> effort, but blogs or CMSs or whatever can either provide
>> access to the HEAD tag or some mechanism for specifying which
>> microformats are in use and adding the required profiles into
>> the HEAD tag itself.
>
>That position doesn't reflect reality; it's akin to Rumsfled saying the
>war was going well. It's what he wanted, but it wasn't true.
Furthermore:
Depends on head element. This summary format may depend on the
author having access to the head element which in many (most?)
web authoring/ publishing scenarios the content author has no
access.
<http://microformats.org/wiki/page-summary-formats#Issues_2>
People can't have it both ways.
--
Andy Mabbett
* Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
* Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
* Are you using Microformats, yet: <http://microformats.org/> ?
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list