wiki-thon? Re: [uf-discuss] Microformats.org usability review
Ryan King
ryan at technorati.com
Thu Feb 2 13:31:52 PST 2006
On Feb 2, 2006, at 12:55 PM, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi Tantek,
>
> On Feb 2, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
>> Ernie, if you think there are "obvious holes", document them on
>> the to-do
>> page, because to the rest of us, there are no "obvious holes",
>> only numerous
>> things we can do to improve the site.
>
> My apologies, I didn't mean that to come across as critical as it
> may have sounded. My point was rather that it seems (at least to
> me) like there's several "potholes" that people new to microformats
> often stumble across, and I wanted to i) gain consensus on what
> they are and how to fix them, and then ii) actually fix them. At
> any rate, here's my wishlist for what I'd like to see done, which
> (at least for me) would be much easier at an event than on my
> lonesome:
>
> ----
> http://microformats.org/wiki/to-do#Ernest_Prabhakar
>
> Coalesce/prioritize existing To-Do items
> Review/revise desired pathways for:
> New users learning about microformats
> Microformat lifecycle
Ah, very good topic, I was thinking about this just yesterday,
because "the process" is one view of a larger system.
> Review existing specs for completeness and consistency
More eyes, fewer bugs!
> Identify areas of 'bitrot' or 'hole-filling'
> Do it!
> ----
>
> Does that make more sense?
Yes. Thanks Ernie.
-ryan
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list