wiki-thon? Re: [uf-discuss] usability review

Ryan King ryan at
Thu Feb 2 13:31:52 PST 2006

On Feb 2, 2006, at 12:55 PM, Dr. Ernie Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi Tantek,
> On Feb 2, 2006, at 11:07 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
>> Ernie, if you think there are "obvious holes", document them on  
>> the to-do
>> page, because to the rest of us, there are no "obvious holes",  
>> only numerous
>> things we can do to improve the site.
> My apologies, I didn't mean that to come across as critical as it  
> may have sounded.   My point was rather that it seems (at least to  
> me) like there's several "potholes" that people new to microformats  
> often stumble across, and I wanted to i) gain consensus on what  
> they are and how to fix them, and then ii) actually fix them.  At  
> any rate, here's my wishlist for what I'd like to see done, which  
> (at least for me)  would be much easier at an event than on my  
> lonesome:
> ----
> Coalesce/prioritize existing To-Do items
> Review/revise desired pathways for:
> 	New users learning about microformats
> 	Microformat lifecycle

Ah, very good topic, I was thinking about this just yesterday,  
because "the process" is one view of a larger system.

> Review existing specs for completeness and consistency

More eyes, fewer bugs!

> Identify areas of 'bitrot' or 'hole-filling'
> Do it!
> ----
> Does that make more sense?

Yes. Thanks Ernie.


More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list