wiki-thon? Re: [uf-discuss] Microformats.org usability review
Christopher St John
ckstjohn at gmail.com
Thu Feb 2 13:57:52 PST 2006
On 2/2/06, Ryan King <ryan at technorati.com> wrote:
> As I was saying... I don't think you can really extricate the process
> from the results. Certainly the philosophy/process could be useful in
> many contexts. Of course, I'd love to be wrong here.
In theory, most spec processes are supposed to start with a review of
existing specs and existing usage. In that sense, microformats is not
different. What's different is that people here take it seriously. The
people are the difference.
That isn't to say being very clear in the docs isn't helpful. The
microformats process is different in some ways, and it's worth
making clear, but I think for most people experiencing is believing.
Christopher St. John
More information about the microformats-discuss