[uf-discuss] hAtom - ready for 0.1?
drernie at opendarwin.org
Mon Feb 27 05:31:37 PST 2006
Stick a fork in it, looks done to me. :-)
Great work, everyone. I'm sure there's much more that could (and
will) be done, but this is an excellent foundation.
-- Ernie P.
On Feb 27, 2006, at 5:03 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote:
> I've been watching eagerly as hAtom has been refined quite nicely by
> everyone's excellent discussions and Ryan King's and David Janes'
> hard work
> in updating the wiki accordingly. I think it is looking quite good.
> I haven't yet completed adding it to my blog yet (still in the
> middle or
> rewrite), and that's perhaps the second to last question I have from a
> content perspective -- how well does that work?
> Also I'd like to hear of when the hAtom2Atom.xslt might be updated
> so we can
> try that on hAtom content and see how well it works.
> Aside from those two things, I personally see no reason not to
> declare hAtom
> as version 0.1 and ready for folks to to use it in general.
> Does anyone know of any significant issues (other than the above) that
> should prevent hAtom from going v0.1?
> Other opinions? What do people think?
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
More information about the microformats-discuss