[uf-discuss] hAtom - ready for 0.1?

[Dr.Ernie Prabhakar]

Stick a fork in it, looks done to me. :-)

Great work, everyone.  I'm sure there's much more that could (and  
will) be done, but this is an excellent foundation.

Best,
-- Ernie P.

On Feb 27, 2006, at 5:03 AM, Tantek Çelik wrote:

> I've been watching eagerly as hAtom has been refined quite nicely by
> everyone's excellent discussions and Ryan King's and David Janes'  
> hard work
> in updating the wiki accordingly.  I think it is looking quite good.
>
>  http://microformats.org/wiki/hatom
>
> I haven't yet completed adding it to my blog yet (still in the  
> middle or
> rewrite), and that's perhaps the second to last question I have from a
> content perspective -- how well does that work?
>
> Also I'd like to hear of when the hAtom2Atom.xslt might be updated  
> so we can
> try that on hAtom content and see how well it works.
>
> Aside from those two things, I personally see no reason not to  
> declare hAtom
> as version 0.1 and ready for folks to to use it in general.
>
> Does anyone know of any significant issues (other than the above) that
> should prevent hAtom from going v0.1?
>
> Other opinions? What do people think?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Tantek
>
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss