[uf-discuss] hReview and the structured blogging tools

David Janes -- BlogMatrix davidjanes at blogmatrix.com
Thu Jan 12 09:10:29 PST 2006

As you know, the structured blogging people have released plugins [1] 
for MT and WordPress that generate microformatted output and, well, 
structured blogging output.

I tried using their review generator and produced [2] which you can see 
[2] doesn't quite get the encoding of the reviews correct.

I was going to send some comments to Phil Pearson about this but I'm 
really not sure what the correct way to encode the review rating are. In 

(1) are the sub-ratings (i.e. quality of service: 3/5) always going to 
be dependent on rel-tag
(2) if it does ... where should the authority be for tags be? Is 
"anything will do" the correct answer?

Regards, etc...

[1] http://structuredblogging.org/
[2] http://www.davidjanes.com/wp/?p=3
[3] http://tinyurl.com/behre

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list