[uf-discuss] hReview feedback
ryan at technorati.com
Wed Jan 18 12:54:38 PST 2006
On Jan 18, 2006, at 12:44 PM, Scott Reynen wrote:
> Ryan King wrote:
>> As is, hReview sets the default lower bound at 1 (which is what
>> most examples in the wild use, despite what http://
>> microformats.org/wiki/reviews-formats seemed to indicate).
> I'm a little confused about the process. I thought the actual
> microformat followed the collection real world examples.
It does. And the current draft of hReview did just that.
> Now you're apparently saying to ignore the real world examples
> collected and just trust that the microformat makes sense. Which
> is it?
What I was saying was that the examples were documented incorrectly.
Several examples had [0-5], notably Amazon, while in reality they
should have been [1-5]. I corrected those on the wiki a little bit
ago, because I realized that it was leading to confusion.
Also, please realize that we've learned a lot about what we now call
'the process,' since the time hReview was started. In fact, we've
learned a lot from developing hReview, as its was the first compound
microformat that was not an isomorphic translation of a preexisting
schema, therefore the first that had to go through a thorough collect
examples, review schemas, brainstorm, iterate loop. In a way, 'the
process' grew out of hReview.
More information about the microformats-discuss