[uf-discuss] Re: DOM scripting as an alternative to
include-pattern? (possible FAQ)
leikam at yahoo.com
Wed Jun 7 09:08:00 PDT 2006
Thanks for your feedback and comments.
I think I hadn't fully appreciated the declarative nature
of the format, probably because I'd been using it within a
the DOM API. The steamroller was at hand and I know how to
Still, I think Ryan nailed it when he said regarding the
That's exactly what it is a kludge.
However, I don't think it semantic abuse of the object
do I believe we have any better options at this point.
you think of a better approach, then that'd be great.
The good reasons for not supporting a DOM-based approach,
which you were all kind enough to spell out for me, still
don't lend much weight in my eyes to the include-pattern
More information about the microformats-discuss