[uf-discuss] attention microformat

[Chris Messina]

I think this discussion stalled because it was hard to bake the
"micro" of "microformats" into attention data... I could be wrong --
but since no one else responded, just thought I'd chime in that I'm
not sure any more work has been done recently on that format -- and
I'm not clear who, if anyone, is driving it anymore.

Chris

On 3/30/06, Nick Swan <nick.swan at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> first message to the emailing list after attending the microformats and
> structured blogging session with Marc Canter and Tantek at Mix06.
>
> I'm interested in using the attention microformat for an application I'm
> working on, and so am seeking clarification as to where this format
> currently is. Checking the wiki entries on the microformat page it seems as
> though initial discussions began, but didn't get much further:
> http://microformats.org/wiki/attention
>
> Checking on the Technorati wiki there is some more information and even a
> sample in microformat:
> http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/attentionxml
> sample:
> http://developers.technorati.com/wiki/AttentionSample
>
> Is this the format that people are currently using who are working on
> attention applications? We are keen to use a standard format so to allow
> people to move their attention data from one service to another, so would
> really appreciate any pointers
>
> Many thanks
>
> Nick Swan
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>
>
>