Language Maps [was RE: [uf-discuss] Microformats vs XML]
connect at stevenR2.com
Mon May 1 11:38:35 PDT 2006
This may start to address it :
---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: Ryan King <ryan at technorati.com>
Reply-To: Microformats Discuss <microformats-discuss at microformats.org>
Date: Mon, 1 May 2006 11:24:08 -0700
>On May 1, 2006, at 1:33 AM, Joe Andrieu wrote:
>> The current microformat model is certainly better than POX, but I
>> think it
>> still leaves something to be desired.
>Certainly. Its not perfect, but it works.
>> This approach still requires that
>> everyone uses the Microformats Approved(r) Anglo-biased namespace,
>> even if
>> they get to add their own term to the class.
>Worse, you have t use the English-based HTML, the English-based CSS,
>the English-based HTTP and so on.
>Internationalization in protocols and formats is a big problem. Much
>bigger than microformats. Maybe we'll be able to advance things in
>microformats, even if only a little.
>I'm curious has anyone here had experience with Internationalizing a
>data format or communication protocol?
>> To the extent we can enable other peoples and languages to "own"
>> Microformats and participate as first class citizens, I suggest it
>> would be
>> a Good Thing(tm).
>I agree. Anything to increase neutrality and accessibility is a Good
>> Couldn't we allow a mapping of any microformat into any
>> language? This seems to be a simple solution for both humans and
>You know, I don't think its really that simple.
>microformats-discuss mailing list
>microformats-discuss at microformats.org
More information about the microformats-discuss