[uf-discuss] Custom Fields Microformat?
bdarcus.lists at gmail.com
Sat Nov 25 08:07:14 PST 2006
On 11/25/06, Manuel Simoni <msimoni at gmail.com> wrote:
> For example, XOXO would force implementors to adapt a list structure,
> which probably is too rigid for them. The hcustomfield-* classes let
> implementors use any layout they desire, and my examples show that the
> use of these three simple classes is enough to unify two major existing
> implementations (Wordpress and Drupal).
Though the problem with the custom property-value approach is that
properties then must be visible. It also seems to go against the
current of current practice (where properties are encoded as
meaningful class names).
More information about the microformats-discuss