[uf-discuss] Custom Fields Microformat?
Stephen Paul Weber
singpolyma at gmail.com
Mon Nov 27 04:32:06 PST 2006
> Since XOXO itself only defines nested lists (and sets) of items with
> arbitrary properties/values (with a certain fixed known set for compat with
> existing uses), there is no expectation that user/author defined properties
> themselves will interoperate.
Although if this were to be wanted in some use cases, an 'XOXO format'
could be defined. I have suggested some possibilities at
have considered the concept of extending uF with XOXO at
More information about the microformats-discuss