[uf-discuss] Implied hCard (was: Is class="vcard fn" illegal?)
scott at randomchaos.com
Thu Nov 30 11:55:44 PST 2006
On Nov 30, 2006, at 1:24 PM, Ryan King wrote:
> On Nov 27, 2006, at 6:55 AM, Ryan Cannon wrote:
>> It would seem that the rule still applies: “ryan at example.com”
>> would be both the FN and Nickname fields. Perhaps parsing could
>> key on the protocol: mailto would imply an
>> and http(s) would imply a URL. Any other protocols would not imply
>> Should I add this to the wiki?
> Why do you say that the @href would be the FN? AFAIK, the the spec
> doesn't state this and no implementation does this.
It's hard to tell what people are responding to when they top-post
replies, but I believe what Ryan Cannon wrote above was in response
>> what about:
>> <a href="mailto:ryan at example.com" class="vcard">
>> ryan at example.com
Here ryan at example.com is both the @href and the node value (assuming <
\a> was intended to be </a>).
More information about the microformats-discuss