[uf-discuss] Idea: beginners/getting started list
Stephen Paul Weber
singpolyma at gmail.com
Mon Oct 16 04:54:00 PDT 2006
I find it's a lot easier to follow one list rather than three... but
perhaps that's just me.
On 10/14/06, Bob Jonkman <bjonkman at sobac.com> wrote:
> How about microformats-new , along with an open microformats-dev, and keep microformats-
> discuss for existing, established microformats.
> microformats-dev could mean "the development of new microformats"; perhaps
> microformats-applications would be a better name...
> This is what Tantek Çelik <microformats-discuss at microformats.org> said
> about "Re: [uf-discuss] Idea: beginners/ge" on 14 Oct 2006 at 12:25
> > In the spirit of simplest solution first, why not start with just *one* new
> > list for new microformats?
> > I think "propose" is too limiting because there is a lot more involved in
> > the development of new microformats than just proposals (in fact, the more
> > important parts are *not* the proposal).
> > I like the suggestions of opening up microformats-dev as well.
> > Anybody else on the list have thoughts?
> > Thanks,
> > Tantek
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
- Stephen Paul Weber, Amateur Writer
MSN/GTalk/Jabber: singpolyma at gmail.com
NSA: stephen4 at northstar-academy.org
More information about the microformats-discuss