[uf-discuss] currency quickpoll results and suggested next step
mikeschinkel at gmail.com
Tue Oct 17 14:05:56 PDT 2006
>> Otherwise, I think the simplest is that I remove your vote from the final
Don't remove my vote! :) I didn't vote for "Currency unit/denomination
used identification" in order to get up to four, (at least one) others did.
From: microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org
[mailto:microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org] On Behalf Of
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 12:14 PM
To: Microformats Discuss
Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] currency quickpoll results and suggested next step
Mike Schinkel wrote:
> My opinion is this sounds like a great idea! Will you be doing the
> edit on the current proposal?
yes, I intend to do before the end of this week.
> I am surprised however at the number of people who felt "Currency
> unit/denomination used identification" was important and it seems like
> an edge case to me. I'm hoping that this become an optional aspect as
> opposed to always required, and the same with amount, actually.
I think that you can change your vote (assuming your re-vote from the same
machine and cookies are one and haven't been erased).
Let me know. Otherwise, I think the simplest is that I remove your vote from
the final results.
> Also, will the current spec worry about the other concerns so as not
> to eliminate the possibility of including them later, or by asking am
> I just removing the benefit of "focusing on the top 3" by asking?
I suggest the current spec focuses on the top 3. The future will be moved to
a "2.0" page. Any concern that some aspects of the 1.0 spec are not be
forward-compatible with 2.0 is relevant for 1.0.
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss at microformats.org
More information about the microformats-discuss