[uf-discuss] "Casual Web Services" and Well Designed Urls
mikeschinkel at gmail.com
Wed Oct 18 13:42:10 PDT 2006
Thanks for the input.
>> but beware of the costs of creating "reserved"/"manditory" structures.
Can you elaborate? Maybe with examples?
From: microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org
[mailto:microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org] On Behalf Of Brian
Sent: Tuesday, October 17, 2006 9:26 AM
To: Microformats Discuss
Subject: Re: RE: [uf-discuss] "Casual Web Services" and Well Designed Urls
On 10/16/06, Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel at gmail.com> wrote:
> But the reason I bring them up here on Microformats discuss as I see
> clean URLs as being important for being able to easily screen scrape
> microformats in a reliable manner for retrieving data programmatically
> as opposed to them being just useful for someone to click a
> bookmarklet and gather some information for personal use. Without
> clean understandable URLs, Microformats are far less useful, IMO.
--- sorry, i can't find a reference, but somewhere there was a big
discussion about ROBOTS.TXT, and FAVICON.ICO, while having a standard name
is helpful, it has also created a "reserved" word out of those file names. I
personally like the way RSS Autodiscovery works, you can name the file (or
files) anything you want and simply point to those.
I personally like clean well-structured URLs, but beware of the costs of
creating "reserved"/"manditory" structures.
That's just my two cents,
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss at microformats.org
More information about the microformats-discuss