[uf-discuss] Size considerations
andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Thu Oct 19 12:43:53 PDT 2006
In message <4f560ed2c921feca9e9eccc7a79a6c94 at technorati.com>, Kevin
Marks <kmarks at technorati.com> writes
>> Other than the "20061103T213000Z" format for dates, what did you
>I removed a redundant 'title'.
You removed the title from:
title="Solihull Branch indoor meetings"
Since it's also in the original mark-up, it also has no bearing on the
increase in file size caused by adding uFs to the page. And, while it
may near-duplicate the linking text in this specific case, that won't
always be so.
>>> gzipped I get 293 vs 451 ratio 1.51
>> So - still an increase of over 50%.
>> That's not insignificant.
>In itself, it's not significant, as it is well under a packet size, as
>I said, and so will not affect download time.
Why is packet size relevant? The page concerned has many - and some have
dozens - of table rows in similar format.
Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
More information about the microformats-discuss