[uf-discuss] Size considerations and other property-names
for "species"
Andy Mabbett
andy at pigsonthewing.org.uk
Sun Oct 22 11:56:01 PDT 2006
In message
<b5d3b8c70610221016v6bd4140bq3a6ce7c1f62f901c at mail.gmail.com>, Charles
Roper <charles.roper at gmail.com> writes
>> bin (binominal)
>
>Binominal or binomial? A discussion on the subject here:
>http://tinyurl.com/tptsh
I'm ambivalent; but another taxonomist advised me, in e-mail, to avoid
"binomial", as that is also used in mathematics. That seemed sensible to
me.
>> cname (common name; "common" used, instead)
>
>"Common" seems like a very common term. How about "vernacular"
>instead?
I'd be happy with either.
>> vgroup (vernacular group)
>
>Not sure about vgroup though.
Alternatives?
>> Other outstanding naming issues are:
>>
>> class should this be "taxoclass" or "classis"?
>
>Or what about "txclass".
Or "taxonclass".
Is there any precedence?
--
Andy Mabbett
Say "NO!" to compulsory ID Cards: <http://www.no2id.net/>
Free Our Data: <http://www.freeourdata.org.uk>
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list