title attribute andabbreviatedclassnames(Was:[uf-discuss]Currency Quickpoll:Preliminary results)

Charles Roper charles.roper at gmail.com
Mon Oct 23 01:39:56 PDT 2006

On 23/10/06, Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel at gmail.com> wrote:
> But, as I said before if I'm the only one concerned about it then I won't
> try to continue to fight this battle...

Mike, I agree with you on this one. I believe imposing complexity
could well discourage adoption. Having deep pool of attributes
available *should one need them* is not necessarily a bad thing, but
requiring complex markup *as a minimum*, is what might put people off.
However, this point become less of an issue if the markup is
automatically generated by a CMS or whatever.

BTW, what is the official name for a microformat attribute? Is it
attribute, value, class-name, or what? I must have missed that bit
when I was reading the wiki. :)


More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list