[uf-discuss] Size considerations and other property-names for "species"

Benjamin West bewest at gmail.com
Mon Oct 23 11:05:41 PDT 2006

> I'm going to poll a few experts on this. I'll let you know when I get
> some feedback.

It's probably more important to poll already published content, to
learn how the market place is already doing it.  This is the whole
point of documenting examples, analyzing publishing behaviour, and
only afterwards determining what the schema and names should be.

Time would be much better spent continuing work on organizing examples
by publisher and publishing behaviour, documenting existing practices,
and discovering the implied schema, as the other microformats have
done.  To my knowledge, this process still isn't complete.

> > Is there any precedence?
The exact question I'm interested in. :-)


More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list