[uf-discuss] Visible Data...a Microformat requirement?
mikeschinkel at gmail.com
Thu Oct 26 01:19:44 PDT 2006
>> just a discouraged usage
You are recommending a discouraged usages?
>> cardinal sin
Is this a pragmatic group that I'm working with, or a bunch of religious
zealots that I've managed to get entangle with?
From: microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org
[mailto:microformats-discuss-bounces at microformats.org] On Behalf Of Ciaran
Sent: Thursday, October 26, 2006 4:15 AM
To: Microformats Discuss
Subject: Re: [uf-discuss] Visible Data...a Microformat requirement?
On 10/26/06, Mike Schinkel <mikeschinkel at gmail.com> wrote:
> I'm still not convinced. I've only heard generalities and no
> specifics on anything I've heard regarding my use-case. RDF is far to
> complicated for the average person creating HTML; one reason why I
> don't think it will ever fly. I still know of nothing else besides
> Microformats that can fill this role; can you give me some specifics that:
> * Is very simple to add
> * Doesn't require access to <head>
> * Can be done today
<a rel="bookmark" href="[whatever]"></a> kind of does what you're talking
about, and it's probably just a discouraged usage rather than a cardinal sin
microformats-discuss mailing list
microformats-discuss at microformats.org
More information about the microformats-discuss