[uf-discuss] Visible Data...a Microformat requirement?

Colin Barrett timber at lava.net
Thu Oct 26 10:37:30 PDT 2006

On Oct 26, 2006, at 7:28 AM, Andy Mabbett wrote:

> In message <ECE2E018-7D8E-4D9F-B73C-81C4D23E14F3 at opendarwin.org>, Dr.
> Ernie Prabhakar <drernie at opendarwin.org> writes
>> As long as you don't  call it a microformat, feel free to experiment.
>> :-)
> Why shouldn't he call it a microformat?

Because it hasn't gone through the (fairly rigorous) demands of the uF  
process -- the process page on the wiki[1] outlines this.


[1] http://microformats.org/wiki/process

More information about the microformats-discuss mailing list