siegfried at rorkvell.de
Tue Oct 31 11:17:11 PST 2006
Am Dienstag, 31. Oktober 2006 19:54 schrieb Scott Reynen:
> But that's just not what rel and rev mean. And this part isn't even
> a meaning we've defined here, so we couldn't change it if we wanted
> to. It's defined in the HTML spec:
> > The rel and rev attributes play complementary roles -- the rel
> > attribute specifies a forward link and the rev attribute specifies
> > a reverse link.
Hmmm, why not? Microformats do already define, that the XXX attribute with the
value of YYY does have meaning ZZZ. So in this case microformats has already
defined that the rev attribute with the value "vote-for" has some special
meaning. Why not define that the rel attribut with the value "vote-for" has
It's not about redefining the rel or rev attribute. It's about redefining
the "vote-for" attribute value if used with the rel attibute.
More information about the microformats-discuss