[uf-discuss] does hatom for comments make sense?

[David Janes]

Why wouldn't it make sense? Comments are structured much the same way
blog posts are. My personal rule of thumb is things that you'd make an
Atom feed for -- and comments certainly fall under this category --
should be worth considering for hAtom if there's a clear HTML
representation.

What isn't defined is the relationship between a hfeed defining a set
of comments and the hentry for the entry the comments are on.

Regards, etc...
David

On 9/11/06, Stephen Paul Weber <singpolyma at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think it makes much sense... I use a 'standard' XOXO markup on
> comments...
>
> On 9/11/06, Stephanie Booth (bunny) <bunnylists+microformats at gmail.com> wrote:
> > A while back somebody showed me a blog marked up with hatom. That
> > person used hatom on the comments too (on the single post page) --
> > that meant two hfeeds: one containing only the post, and another one
> > with the comments.
> >
> > Does this way of using hatom on comments make sense to you? I noticed
> > that neither K2 nor Sandbox wordpress themes do this.
> >
> > Steph
> >
> > --
> > http://climbtothestars.org/
> > _______________________________________________
> > microformats-discuss mailing list
> > microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
> >
>
>
> --
> - Stephen Paul Weber, Amateur Writer
> <http://www.awriterz.org>
>
> MSN/GTalk/Jabber: singpolyma at gmail.com
> ICQ/AIM: 103332966
> NSA: stephen4 at northstar-academy.org
> BLOG: http://singpolyma-tech.blogspot.com/
> _______________________________________________
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
>