[uf-discuss] does hatom for comments make sense?
davidjanes at blogmatrix.com
Mon Sep 11 15:51:20 PDT 2006
Why wouldn't it make sense? Comments are structured much the same way
blog posts are. My personal rule of thumb is things that you'd make an
Atom feed for -- and comments certainly fall under this category --
should be worth considering for hAtom if there's a clear HTML
What isn't defined is the relationship between a hfeed defining a set
of comments and the hentry for the entry the comments are on.
On 9/11/06, Stephen Paul Weber <singpolyma at gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't think it makes much sense... I use a 'standard' XOXO markup on
> On 9/11/06, Stephanie Booth (bunny) <bunnylists+microformats at gmail.com> wrote:
> > A while back somebody showed me a blog marked up with hatom. That
> > person used hatom on the comments too (on the single post page) --
> > that meant two hfeeds: one containing only the post, and another one
> > with the comments.
> > Does this way of using hatom on comments make sense to you? I noticed
> > that neither K2 nor Sandbox wordpress themes do this.
> > Steph
> > --
> > http://climbtothestars.org/
> > _______________________________________________
> > microformats-discuss mailing list
> > microformats-discuss at microformats.org
> > http://microformats.org/mailman/listinfo/microformats-discuss
> - Stephen Paul Weber, Amateur Writer
> MSN/GTalk/Jabber: singpolyma at gmail.com
> ICQ/AIM: 103332966
> NSA: stephen4 at northstar-academy.org
> BLOG: http://singpolyma-tech.blogspot.com/
> microformats-discuss mailing list
> microformats-discuss at microformats.org
More information about the microformats-discuss