[uf-discuss] a very early draft proposal hTagcloud
Matthew Levine
matthew at infocraft.com
Wed Sep 20 02:45:06 PDT 2006
On Sep 20, 2006, at 1:39 AM, Ben Ward wrote:
> Personally I quite like the nested behaviour. I accept that is also
> unspecified implied semantics, but it doesn't seem unreasonable…
> that said, you can get four levels of tag cloud without nesting of
> the same element (by using STRONG as well)....
>
> Would four levels be enough?
According to John's usage study [1], five levels would be enough for
del.icio.us, Web Connections, and possibly ZoomClouds. You could eke
out a fifth level by making nesting order significant:
<ol class="hTagcloud">
<li>Level One</li>
<li><em>Level Two</em></li>
<li><strong>Level Three</strong></li>
<li><strong><em>Level Four</em></strong></li>
<li><em><strong>Level Five</strong></em></li>
</ol>
Example CSS:
.hTagcloud em { font-size: 1.2em; }
.hTagcloud strong { font-size: 1.4em; }
.hTagcloud em strong { font-size: 1.6em; }
/* Level Four gets 1.2em * 1.4em ~ 1.68em
Level Five gets 1.6em * 1.2em ~ 1.92em */
However, I'm not whether I like exploiting nesting order. It feels a
bit hackish, and isn't as semantically unambiguous as Ben's initial
example.
- Matthew
[1] http://microformatique.com/?page_id=34
--
Infocraft: handcrafted markup for savvy designers.
http://www.infocraft.com/
More information about the microformats-discuss
mailing list